Evidence for civil standards in court is mandatory to be provided in a legal way to prove the allegation correct. Without a solid base, any plaintiff cannot win the case against a defendant. Any person who has less knowledge of the sexual misconduct case cannot draw any statement about the truth or false ground of action present in the incident.
The aim of the investigation
A proper investigation ensures the fact-finding, proof-collection, objective, solid evidence, action to sue or bring a lawsuit against someone. Superficial understandings of sexual assault need subjective assessment and potential to make the charge valid. If the allegation is true, then it does not take the jurisdiction and solicitor to sue the defendant. Sometimes the aim of the lawyer is to prove the false allegations true with false evidence and actions. Those cases are an incorrect justice of the court. Some facts are socially fabricated and build like a false plot of any film.
What is false allegation?
While bringing a lawsuit against any sexual harassment case one cannot take charge of any person without the ground presence of the molestation, abuse or rape case. Sexual assault has spread globally nowadays with the increase in crime & corruption. Meanwhile, some people are taking the wrong advantage of these cases and testifying false cases against innocent men. Some girls do this for rivalry other blame innocent people to obtain money. The complaint characteristics must be prominent and they should not get a blend of consensual sex or past intimacy records with the defendant.
Some false allegation cases that were dismissed
1. Frank D’Angelo (Entrepreneur, director, anchor, former Brewer)
On June 2007 the case of sexual misconduct against D’Angelo was taken to Ontario court. The 22-year plaintiff testified that Frank took her to a hotel room, stripped her clothes and raped her. There was no presence of evidence against Frank D’Angelo. The ground of consequence has also presented an affair between the lady and Frank. Frank testified to it as consensual sex. In the case, Judge says former brewery owner 'probably guilty' of sexual assault. Due to the ground of action and lack of evidence the case was dismissed by Ontario court and it was proved that D’Angelo is not guilty.
2. Peter Stoffer (Former Nova Scotia NDP MP)
On February 2006, Peter Stoffer was accused by an NDP fellow staff for forcefully attempt to kiss & hug her. In the six-minute news conference, Stoffer declared that he never had any past record on physical assault. When the Federal court did not get any recording, messages and other shreds of evidence against Peter Stoffer, the plaintiff was asked to provide solid proofs against the defendant. When she failed to do so, then the case was dismissed by the court.
Final Approach
The aim of investigation and grounds of action is the necessary part of any sexual misconduct case. These types of cases do not hold any point and claimed as false allegations or wrong charge of sexual harassment.