Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Legal Procedure of Investigation Related to Sexual Misconduct

Evidence for civil standards in court is mandatory to be provided in a legal way to prove the allegation correct. Without a solid base, any plaintiff cannot win the case against a defendant. Any person who has less knowledge of the sexual misconduct case cannot draw any statement about the truth or false ground of action present in the incident.



The aim of the investigation

A proper investigation ensures the fact-finding, proof-collection, objective, solid evidence, action to sue or bring a lawsuit against someone. Superficial understandings of sexual assault need subjective assessment and potential to make the charge valid. If the allegation is true, then it does not take the jurisdiction and solicitor to sue the defendant. Sometimes the aim of the lawyer is to prove the false allegations true with false evidence and actions. Those cases are an incorrect justice of the court. Some facts are socially fabricated and build like a false plot of any film.       

What is false allegation?

While bringing a lawsuit against any sexual harassment case one cannot take charge of any person without the ground presence of the molestation, abuse or rape case. Sexual assault has spread globally nowadays with the increase in crime & corruption. Meanwhile, some people are taking the wrong advantage of these cases and testifying false cases against innocent men. Some girls do this for rivalry other blame innocent people to obtain money. The complaint characteristics must be prominent and they should not get a blend of consensual sex or past intimacy records with the defendant.

Some false allegation cases that were dismissed

1. Frank D’Angelo (Entrepreneur, director, anchor, former Brewer)
On June 2007 the case of sexual misconduct against D’Angelo was taken to Ontario court. The 22-year plaintiff testified that Frank took her to a hotel room, stripped her clothes and raped her. There was no presence of evidence against Frank D’Angelo. The ground of consequence has also presented an affair between the lady and Frank. Frank testified to it as consensual sex. In the case, Judge says former brewery owner 'probably guilty' of sexual assault. Due to the ground of action and lack of evidence the case was dismissed by Ontario court and it was proved that D’Angelo is not guilty.

2. Peter Stoffer (Former Nova Scotia NDP MP)
On February 2006, Peter Stoffer was accused by an NDP fellow staff for forcefully attempt to kiss & hug her. In the six-minute news conference, Stoffer declared that he never had any past record on physical assault. When the Federal court did not get any recording, messages and other shreds of evidence against Peter Stoffer, the plaintiff was asked to provide solid proofs against the defendant. When she failed to do so, then the case was dismissed by the court.

Final Approach


The aim of investigation and grounds of action is the necessary part of any sexual misconduct case. These types of cases do not hold any point and claimed as false allegations or wrong charge of sexual harassment.  

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

Famous Brewery Owners who Fought Allegations against Sexual Misconduct

Enmeshed in the dispute of gender & sexuality, physical assault or sexual misconduct is rising day by day around the globe. Some women are an innocent victim to the prey of molestation or abuse, but some blame in a wrong way with a false allegation to the defendant. Here are the names of two famous brewery owners who confronted false allegation of sexual misconduct:

Frank D’Angelo

Frank D’Angelo the former Canadian brewery owner of ‘Steelback Brewer’ started his business in September 2002. He is a homegrown auteur who got success in multiple platforms. He never had any past criminal record. The entrepreneur’s brewery business gained popularity because of juices and hard drinks like ‘Cheetah’. D’Angelo also received Canadian & Ontario Brewing awards in 2007, 2008 and 2009. 


Allegation & Exemption of Frank D’Angelo

On June 2007, D’Angelo was accused by a 22-year old woman for grabbing, stripping and forcing her to have sex in a hotel room. John Hamilton the lawyer of D’Angelo testified that both the points of plaintiff and defendant are under the condition, but no evidence against Frank is found. Therefore, the judge says former brewery owner 'probably guilty' of sexual assault. The term ‘probably’ reveals the uncertainty of proof against the entrepreneur. Later, the case was dismissed because of the early affair record between the plaintiff (the 22-year woman) and defendant (Frank D’Angelo). The case was proved as consensual sex between the two. Many haters revealed different comments, but at the end, Frank was declared innocent by the Ontario Court.

Juan T. O'naghten

Juan T. O’Naghten is a former U.S Army Paratrooper, brewery business owner, and a Real Estate business proprietor in Miami, Florida. In 2017 he opened a ‘Nightlife Brewing Company’ at Marlins Park. There were no criminal records against him in Miami court, but he was entangled in mysterious social media battle related to false allegations.



The case against the brewery owner

On an afternoon of 2017 a page-long statement to Nightlife’s social media pages including Instagram & Facebook. The attack on sexual attack was reported by an anonymous hater or business rival of Juan. The incognito social media profile has incorrectly accused him of sexual misconduct with a woman without any name. The haters also called him ‘rapist’ without any proof. However, the supporters of Juan O’Naghten supported him in social posts by commenting positively on. Later, he was proved innocent because the false allegations were proved as the attack of business rivals of the brewery owner.

Final Approach

Several cases of sexual misconduct are a genuine allegation, but sometimes the wrongly accused of rape and molestation may cause the reputation of an innocent defendant. There are several famous brewery owners who were wrongly accused, but verdict and evidence proved the allegations false.

Tuesday, June 5, 2018

Significant Facts That Proved the Allegations against Frank D’Angelo Incorrect

Sexual misconduct is an unwelcoming brutal behavior, which is forcefully done on the victim against her wish. But, sometimes innocent people are erroneously accused of sexual assault case under the law. It happened with Frank D’Angelo the well-known homegrown auteur in June 2007.